And, on the other, and regarding Traktor itself, as it has been already stated around here, they are building the whole program from the ground, because legacy code is what is impeeding them to grow and evolve properly (which is also why they are loosing market share dramatically in favor of their competition.). NI might not be in its best shape, but they rose loads of money from investors a few years ago, that served much to roll out their release plans for all latest Traktor, Kontrol, Maschine and all those hardware equipment (and that aside of all their software updates, including TP3 and TDJ).ĪFIK, NI plans are, on a one hand, release a new somewhat unified piece of software that would make all their hardware equipment and software understand and speak to each other (meaning Maschine, Kontrol, Traktor, etc.). If they release a DDJ-1000mk2 with the features the mk1 is missing I might jump ship. I haven't yet because frankly the only Pioneer controller I sort-of like is the DDJ-1000 and I don't entirely like it. A lot of people are jumping to Rekordbox. It could be another 4 years before it reaches the level of maturity that TP3 has taken so many to reach. ![]() ![]() The problem is: how long is it going to take? It could be another two years before the new Traktor Pro comes out, and then it will still be in its infancy. I remember when they added parallel waveforms, which apparently were bolted on by two developers who reluctantly volunteered to do it, as if Traktor was the last thing anyone at NI wanted to work on, which sort of made me think at the time they already had definite plans to ditch it and write a direct replacement from the ground up. So, even if they don't want to use the old codebase, they should definitely keep some of the old TP features and workflow. I mean Traktor Pro ain't bad at all, it's just that it's weak in some areas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |